Low Price Waterpik Waterflosser Cordless PLUS Best Price

Best Waterpik Waterflosser Cordless PLUS – For Sale

  • Dental water jet is clinically proven to be up to 93-percent more effective than flossing for improved gum health
  • Orthodontic tip is three times as effective as floss for plaque removal
  • Advanced ergonomic design with non-slip grip and easy-fill reservoir
  • Dual pressure control system for gentle-to-deep cleaning
  • Rechargeable device requires no batteries

Ultra Cordless Dental Water JetEasier and more effective than flossing with string, the Waterpik Cordless Plus Water Flosser WP 450 powers away plaque and debris between teeth and below the gumline. Its dual water pressure control system provides gentle-to-deep cleaning. Four unique tips clean in specialized ways, while a cordless design provides flexibility and convenience.
Waterpik Ultra Cordless
Water Flosser WP 45

List Price: $ 49.99

Add a comment »3 comments to this article

  1. 489 of 501 people found the following review helpful:
    5.0 out of 5 stars
    I wonder about other reviews, September 1, 2009
    Amazon Verified Purchase(What’s this?)
    This review is from: Waterpik Waterflosser Cordless PLUS (Health and Beauty)

    I was ambivalent about buying this based on the reviews that I have read. I will say up front I do not have a Waterpik that sits on my counter top and plugs into the wall socket. I had one once and will never own one again. You pull on the hose and the unit travels across the counter. No I found that I like the cordless ones better. I have own the Waterpik WP-360W. It was OK but the battery pretty much had to be charged every week if used daily. It held just enough water to get the job done, it was hard to fill with water under the bathroom sink and I got about 3 years use from it until the unit stop charging due to corrosion where the charger plugs into the unit(This is because water spills on the connection).

    I then bought the Panasonic EW-1270AC. This was fine for travel but it had allot of problems like the water cap always falling off, water leaking out when you needed to store it in the suitcase(always had to keep it in a zip loc bag to prevent the remaining water that was always there even after emptying in sink), the tip always falling on the floor as the way it was to be stored should have held the tip better. Allot of germs on the floor. Plus the batteries were not rechargeable. So even after reading the reviews on the new Waterpik Cordless Dental Jet I bought one. For the life of me I could not understand why so many negative and mediocre reviews on this unit. But I figure it could not be that bad as it was the number one seller of cordless water jets. Here is a little contrast and compare on the reviews and my unit the WP-450 Ultra;

    1. It is so loud it will wake anyone sleeping. Coffee grinder loud!
    ** Yes I guess it is loud as it is near you ear while using! But not that loud to me(i.e. I am a bit hard of hearing) My woman says it is not that loud and she has great hearing**

    2. The reservoir is so small it runs out in 10 seconds.
    ** Maybe this user has a leak in his unit. I use mine for about 30 seconds until all food is removed and I still have half of the water left. And yes I am using the High pressure setting. **

    3. The tip is so mobile (rotates all over the place), you can’t control it.
    ** Mine doesn’t. Of course I have only had it a month. **

    4. It is poorly designed, too large, and difficult to hold (Can’t imagine if you have small hands).
    ** I thought it was well ergonomically designed. I have nerve damage in my hand that makes it hard to hold on to things and get tops off of bottles but I had no problem holding the WP-450 Ultra. I think it is most excellent! **

    5. Poor battery life, long charge time, no charge indicator. After two uses I needed to recharge! (yes I let it charge up initially for 16 hours!).
    ** I have only charged my unit for 8 hours and have been using once a day for a month. I has not slacked off one bit in pumping the water out. **

    6. Expensive, Poor Value: Price is ~70% higher than the WP-360
    ** Yes that is usually the case for older models. They usually do cost less than newer models as the cost of production is higher than years ago. It is actually 61.4 % higher in cost. The old unit uses Ni-Cad batteries as the new one uses more expensive L-Ion or NiMH batteries hence the higher cost and the L-Ion battery can hold a charge longer. **

    7. Poor Reservoir Capacity -only 120 ml or 20% less than the already-tiny WP-360′s 150 ml
    ** I do not know how you can say that. I fill my units up to max and the new Water Jet holds twice the amount of water then the WP-360. Also I had to use a paper cup the fill up the old WP-360 **

    8. Terrible portability, large/inefficient size, ungainly ergonomics
    ** Well it is not touted as a travel water jet just a cordless one for home use. The Panasonic however is a true Travel/Portable unit as advertised. **

    9. Weak water stream.
    ** You’ve got to be kidding. It has two settings and is way better then the WP-360 and about the same pressure as the Panasonic model. Are you sure you have it charged up? **

    10. Very bad. Main problem is the tip won’t stay fixed, it keeps rotating, so it sprays water everywhere but your teeth.
    ** I have not observed this problem. My tips stays right where it should. I will report back if this changes. **

    11. The reservoir is so small that it empties before you are ready to stop using it. It should be at least 2 1/2 times the size.
    ** I have to wonder what you are using this for. I use mine to remove the food particles from the gums and between teeth. When things stop coming out of the mouth am done. My dentist says I have the best gums of any patient he has in his practice and I only use this once a day before bed. **

    It appears that the problem with the old WP-360 was the fact that the charger contacts on the front would get water inside no matter how…

    Read more

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

  2. 70 of 73 people found the following review helpful:
    3.0 out of 5 stars
    A Solution to the “battery” problem., September 19, 2008
    By 
    Ed Every (CT) –
    This review is from: Waterpik Waterflosser Cordless PLUS (Health and Beauty)

    I have had two rechargable Waterpiks. Both had the same problem. After about 5 or 10 months the unit gradually loses the ability to charge up. Most users assume that the battery became defective.

    I really need this thing so I decided to look into it and found that the battery in each case was fine. What happens is that the connector on the charging cable gradually deteriorates. This might be due to getting wet repeatedly combined with corrosion and deposits. The inside of the female part of the connector gets get eaten away and actually gets larger in diameter. The electrical connection deteriorates and finally becomes unusable. As a result the battery no longer gets recharged.

    I found that the “AdaptaPlug” connector system available at Radio Shack has the same pin diameter and pin spacing. By whittling some plastic away I made a better connector from the Radio Shack parts and now the Waterpiks work like new.

    The part numbers of the Radio Shack connectors needed are:
    Male: 273-1742
    Female: 273-1743

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

  3. 80 of 85 people found the following review helpful:
    4.0 out of 5 stars
    Much improved over WP-360, December 2, 2007
    By 
    Wilfred Poon “wil” (Glendale, CA USA) –
    (REAL NAME)
      

    This is a bigger unit than the WP-360 and thus holds more water in the container. The real difference is in the battery. I can easily go over a week, using it twice a day, before charging whereas the WP-360 would never last a week. I have owned 4 WP-360s and each of them stopped holding a charge after abour 3-4 months. Let’s hope they solved the problem with the WP-450. I have a feeling they did.

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

Copyright © All Rights Reserved · Green Hope Theme by Sivan & schiy · Proudly powered by WordPress